The American Society for Psychical Research is but a shadow of its former self. So says Guy Lyon Playfair in a recent overview of the ASPR's history published in the Fortean Times (not available online as far as I know).
The Society, founded in 1885 as a companion organization to England's previously established Society for Psychical Research, has had a storied history marked by the contributions of many leading figures in the field, including William James, James Hyslop, Walter Franklin Pierce, Gardner Murphy, and Karlis Osis. In 1972 membership peaked at 2,554.
These days, Playfair argues, it's all gone downhill.
With the retirement of Osis in 1983, in-house activity slowed down and soon ground to a near-halt, or so it appears. For the past 20 years or so, information on the Society’s current activities has been hard to come by. My own request for it was not answered or acknowledged. There have been no Journal or Proceedings since 2004, although the ASPR website remains, inviting those with personal experiences to report to send them to William Roll (although he died in January 2012). Veteran parapsychologist George Hansen estimated in 2007 after a trawl through the society’s tax returns, that membership had fallen from 591 in 1988 to just 23 in 2005. He also noted that its current executive director still enjoys a six-figure salary. His tersely understated conclusion: “It is unclear what services the ASPR actually provides.”
Author Stacy Horn is quoted as saying that her repeated requests to access the ASPR’s archive were rebuffed. “For a year and a half they put me off and I finally accepted that they just didn’t want me to see anything. They wouldn’t even tell me what they had. I’ve since learned that I am just one in a long line of people who had similar experiences with the ASPR.”
It's too bad. With the growth of paranormal websites and TV shows, there's a real opportunity for a revival of the ASPR. Sadly, Playfair's account makes that rosy scenario seem unlikely.
"He also noted that its current executive director still enjoys a six-figure salary. His tersely understated conclusion: “It is unclear what services the ASPR actually provides."
It sure would be interesting to know what an average work day looks like for that guy. :)
Posted by: Bruce Siegel | October 20, 2014 at 03:09 AM
With its history, association with William James and the British SPR, the ASPR should be the leading force for making credible information about the paranormal available to Americans, and the world in general. With proper management, it should be well funded.
If the current director is pulling down a six figure income, then there's obviously some money laying around somewhere. If the twenty three member figure is correct, then there's a dead mouse stinking in that house somewhere.
Who hires (fires?) the director? As a non profit organization, I'm sure there must be some investigative avenues available to pursue.
The big question is, who wants to be the one to initiate an inquiry?
Posted by: Rabbitdawg | October 20, 2014 at 09:30 AM
It's no secret how desperate parapsychology labs are for money. Six figures... my rough back-of-the-envelope calculation says that could pay for at least two full-time researchers. Considering that you could count the number of full-time parapsychologists in the USA on one hand, these charges are very serious indeed.
Posted by: Stephen Baumgart | October 20, 2014 at 12:27 PM
According to information provided by George Hansen, Patrice Keane was the executive director of the ASPR in 1998, 2005 and 2010. (She may well have been director throughout this time period, but Hansen only provided info for the three years mentioned.)
Anyway, in 1998, she was paid $65,600 for her services. In 2005 the figure jumped to $150,783 and in 2010 it was $139,955.
References:
http://paranormaltrickster.blogspot.com/2007/08/salary-in-parapsychology-patrice-keane.html
http://api.ning.com/files/5LgZOrMR36QKTXyURHSbtrihy2u3STEj5rWfBstegTHD3FqFnL5nW57SJXElIC7dq-oy1An0hc8CZL33T73WOxT5tHK4Bzag/HansenASPSI2012PanelNewDevelopmentsCenterVsPeriphery.pdf
Posted by: Doug D. | October 21, 2014 at 01:35 AM
CitizenAudit.org lists income tax returns for the ASPR from 2001 through 2012. I was able to view for free all the returns except the one for 2002. A paywall has since popped up, so I can't view any more returns for a while.
Here is executive director Patrice Keane's base annual compensation for the years mentioned:
2012 $139,955
2011 $139,955
2010 $139,955
2009 $139,955
2008 $139,955
2007 $139,955
2006 $105,318
2005 $150,783
2004 $ 97,375
2003 $ 95,000
2002
2001 $ 93,104
It looks like she (he?) is the only executive who received a salary.
If anyone else is interested in viewing ASPR returns, here's the link I used:
https://www.citizenaudit.org/131655205/
Posted by: Doug D. | October 21, 2014 at 03:22 AM
Michael, thanks for the informative post!
Hmmm... if they have no members left, then I don't see how the director could have the money for a six-figure salary. That just doesn't add up. Unless they have an endowment that he is just sucking away at.
In any case, unpleasant but not particularly surprising information.
Posted by: Matt Rouge | October 21, 2014 at 03:30 AM
The 2012 return, viewable at the link Doug D. provided, shows that the ASPR had assets of $2.93 million at the beginning of that year, but only $2.07 million at the end. In addition to $170,000 in salaries, they had "other expenses" of $780,000, for a total expenditure of $950,000. Their income consisted of $32,000 in grants and $2,000 in investment income. In short, they seem to be burning through a large endowment rather quickly.
Posted by: Michael Prescott | October 21, 2014 at 10:05 AM
George Hansen blogged about the ASPR in 2007:
http://paranormaltrickster.blogspot.com/2007/08/salary-in-parapsychology-patrice-keane.html
Posted by: Michael Prescott | October 22, 2014 at 12:47 PM
Michael - Thanks for opening this can of worms a bit wider. Re Stephen Baumgart's comment, let me just say that I did not make any 'charges' but only reported already published facts, as I was advised to do. They speak for themselves better than I could. I would not disagree with any of the Comments.
Posted by: G.L.Playfair | October 22, 2014 at 02:15 PM
I wonder how this compares to the SPR.
Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2014 at 03:40 PM
Thanks for bringing up this topic, Guy Lyon Playfair. Thanks also to George Hansen for his work on the issue, and for bringing it to my attention in an email.
BTW, in answer to Doug D.'s question, Patrice Keane is female.
Posted by: Michael Prescott | October 22, 2014 at 04:06 PM
Actually I can answer my own question:
Year Income (£) Expenditure
to Sep 2013 425000 156000
to 2012 671000 151000
to 2011 152000 155000
membership totals:
As at end Sept 2013: 774 (850 inc students and Associates)
2012: 758 (834)
Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2014 at 07:11 PM
"Playfair" -- a very apt name! :)
Posted by: James Oeming | October 22, 2014 at 10:13 PM
Here's a link to Stacy Horn's blog entry about her experiences with the ASPR:
http://www.echonyc.com/~horn/unbelievable/?p=2412
Posted by: James Oeming | October 24, 2014 at 02:11 PM
I find it disturbing in the extreme, that so much money is sitting in idle endowments and yet some truly exciting psi research is languishing through lack of relatively small amounts. I'm sure Stephen Baumgart's lab above would be eager to receive just a percent of the ASPR endowment funds. The British SPR recently inherited a large bequest of the order £700,000, and yet the funds are eararked for such pedestrian projectssuch as funding an encyclopedia and publishing a few books. It's truly depressing...
Posted by: michael duggan | November 01, 2014 at 01:36 AM
Michael Duggan
I think that the proposed online encyclopedia currently being written and supported by SPR funding is a very worthwhile activity. The hope is that it will provide a much needed balance to misleading and erroneous Wikipedia articles about non-mainstream thought. Is that what you are referring to?
I also really appreciate the books that the SPR publishes which, without them I would have no opportunity to read reports published in their Proceedings of 100 years ago. - AOD
Posted by: Amos Oliver Doyle | November 01, 2014 at 02:16 PM