I just finished reading John Wayne: American, by Randy Roberts and James S. Olson, an exhaustively researched and briskly written biography of a man who, for many, came to define traditional American values. The book reveals Wayne to have been a more complex and interesting figure than his on-screen persona might suggest. By the end I felt genuinely sorry for him as the book recounted his last, painful battle with stomach cancer.
But I also couldn't help thinking that the way he faced his death is the way most people face it these days -- as an issue they have never really confronted or even dared to think about, which takes them by surprise and knocks them for a loop.
Here are some excerpts from the book's last chapter:
Duke was up and walking around [in the hospital] on January 17, when the pathologists reported to Longmire that the gastric lymph nodes were full of microscopic tumor cells. Wayne displayed no outward reaction when Longmire gave him the news. It was almost as if he were not listening, or not hearing the feared fact that the disease was spreading....
He was relieved to get out of the hospital, but he lashed out at Pat Stacy when she asked him how soon the radiation treatments at Hoag would begin. Suddenly he denied ever hearing about radiation treatments from Longmire, claiming that the surgeon had told him that all of the tumor had been removed in the operation and that he was going to be just fine. Everyone else in the family, including Stacy, knew about the radiation, but he insisted emphatically and angrily that he had not been told, that he did not want any more surprises, that he was sick of hospitals and doctors and nurses and medicine and cancer.
He eventually agreed to undergo the treatments, although he insisted on absolute secrecy....
Everyone around him felt his wrath. Wayne's temper had always been somewhat unpredictable, but it was mitigated by his willingness to forgive and his omnipresent love for life. He hated pettiness, but with his body crumbling and his life slipping away, he found himself becoming just that -- angry, frustrated, irritable, and petty....
The weekend after the Oscar presentation [when he made his last public appearance], Wayne wanted to get out of the house and do something fun, maybe go out on the water for a weekend. He called Ralph and Marjorie Wingfield, his longtime friends from Nogales, Arizona, to fly out to Los Angeles and sail with him to Catalina Island on [his yacht] the Wild Goose. Marjorie was fighting her own battle against cancer. Still, he would not talk about his except to mention several times that he figured the doctors had gotten it all this time, just like they had back in 1964. They nodded their heads but knew better....
[Back in the hospital again, and suffering badly,] Duke asked his son Patrick to go home to Newport Beach and bring back the Smith & Wesson .38 he kept on the bedside table. When Patrick refused, he asked Pat Stacy to get it. "I want," he told her, "to blow my brains out." When she, too, refused, he exploded in frustration.... Wayne left Hoag a few days later and he had the Smith & Wesson at his disposal. But he couldn't do it. He was still hoping against hope for some kind of Hollywood miracle....
[He returned to the hospital and was diagnosed with terminal cancer. It was inoperable.] Still, John Wayne expected more treatment; he wanted to live. He was not ready to accept reality. Nor were his doctors....
[T]hey asked him if he was interested in an experimental program designed to stimulate his own immunological system. At the time there was a good deal of optimism among cancer specialists about the possibilities of a drug named interferon.... Wayne agreed to become part of the program.... Nobody even whispered to him that he was dying or how long he had to live because he still could not talk about it....
Experimental medicine is just that -- experimental -- and Wayne's cancer was growing too fast for the interferon to have any chance.... The doctors at UCLA knew it, but they were human beings, too. They had a famous patient on their hands who was still denying his own imminent death, refusing to talk about it, and willing to try something -- anything -- to preserve his life. To keep his hopes up and to maintain their own images as healers and scientists, they went ahead with the treatments, and Wayne dutifully submitted to the needles, tests, and examinations....
[T]he only possible comfort now could be religious. There was no doubt among any of his friends that he believed in God.... But Wayne never developed a denominational loyalty.... God, for Duke, was simply the "Big Man Upstairs" to whom you turned for problems you could not solve yourself....
He was not more or less afraid [of dying] than any other normal person. He said that much in his interview with Barbara Walters, when she asked him if he feared death. Three months after the January 1979 interview, when he turned to the Catholic Church, he was not having any apparitions of the Virgin Mary or going through deathbed repentance or trying, with one foot in the grave, to get the other foot into heaven.... He was just getting ready to meet his maker, as a man should, and the Catholic Church -- the church of his family and of his closest friends -- was as good a way as he knew to do it....
[As the disease progressed] he was also throwing up bilious fluids from down in the small intestine every few minutes, and he could not sleep. Life was quickly boiling down to mere survival, just hanging on until it got even tougher....
Wayne refused to talk with anyone about his imminent death, but he symbolically acknowledged it by selling the Wild Goose early in June.... [H]e could never bring himself to do it, at least not until he was on his deathbed and realized he would never see the Goose again....
Mary St. John visited with him three days before he died.... He was searching for peace and asked Mary what she thought of death. She quoted a passage from The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam:
Strange, is it not? that of the myriads who
Before us pass'd the door of Darkness through,
Not one returns to tell us of the Road,
Which to discover we must travel too.
Wayne looked at her quizzically and asked her to repeat the passage, which Mary did. He quietly remarked: "You know, I never thought of it that way."...
He took his last gasping breath at 5:23 p.m. on June 11, 1979.
Another excellent biography is Teller of Tales, by Daniel Stashower, a fascinating study of Arthur Conan Doyle, which treats his researches into spiritualism with evenhandedness and respect. Doyle was 71 years old -- just one year younger than John Wayne -- when he passed away. Like Wayne, he had been a vigorous public figure for decades, extroverted, sure of himself, ready and eager to jump into any debate. But unlike Wayne, he had spent years pondering the mystery of mortality and collecting evidence that convinced him, beyond doubt, of life after death.
Here's how he met his end, as Stashower tells it:
Two months after the fire [that destroyed his home], Conan Doyle embarked on another round of travels. "I am off next week to do Holland, Denmark, Stockholm and Oslo," he told Harry Price. "My ambition is to speak in each European non-Catholic capital before I pass." Although the schedule was lighter and the reception more cordial than it had been in Africa, his health buckled under the strain. In Copenhagen, he suffered a bout of agonizing chest pains, but refused to curtail his speaking schedule. In near constant pain, he carried on with his slate of lectures, often clinging to the podium for balance. Returning to England on the Channel ferry in November, he had to be carried ashore.
Doctors were summoned to confirm what Conan Doyle already knew. "I write this in bed," he told a friend in America, "as I have broken down badly and have developed Angina Pectoris. So there is just a chance that I may talk it all over with [the deceased] Houdini himself before very long. I view the prospect with perfect equanimity. That is one thing that psychic knowledge does. It removes all fear of the future."
Against his doctors' orders, he struggled up to London to honor a speaking commitment at an Armistice Day spiritualist assembly. Riding to the Albert Hall in a cab, he suffered another attack. He leaned heavily on his sons as he staggered into the hall, and delivered his speech in a halting, weakened voice. Refusing to admit to his infirmity, he gave a second speech later in the day.
His doctors now ordered complete bed rest. A sickroom was established on the ground floor at Windlesham, as Conan Doyle now had difficulty climbing the stairs....
Through the early months of 1930, he showed brief periods of improved health. He took advantage of his renewed energy to revise his autobiography, adding a chapter entitled "Up to Date," and to write a modest paragraph of introduction for The Edge of the Unknown, a collection of spiritualist essays.
On July 1, he went to the battlements for the last time. For some months he had been lobbying against an ancient piece of legislation called the Witchcraft Act, dating to the reign of James I, which had been revived as a means of prosecuting mediums. A steady flow of letters brought about a meeting with the home Secretary, Mr. J.R. Clynes. Jean accompanied him to the Home Office and watched anxiously, clutching a vial of smelling salts, as her husband rose unsteadily to plead his case.... His voice faltering, Conan Doyle went ahead with his prepared statement, drumming his fingers against his chest as though to keep his heart beating.
He returned home badly weakened.... One cold spring morning, his son later recalled, he rose from his sickroom and stole out into the garden, unseen by anyone in the house. A few moments later, the butler heard a crash in the hallway. He found Conan Doyle lying on the floor, gasping for breath....
He told his family that he did not wish to die in bed. As the crisis neared, they helped him to a chair where he could look out at the Sussex countryside. He died there, surrounded by his family, on the morning of Monday, July 7, 1930. He was seventy-one years old. His last words were addressed to his wife. "You are wonderful," he said.
"The reader will judge that I have had many adventures," he had written a few days earlier. "The greatest and most glorious of all awaits me now."
In comparing these two deaths, I don't mean to disparage Wayne or to suggest that Doyle's spiritualism was the only factor in his more positive attitude. One difference, of course, is that the successes of modern medicine have led people to expect and demand miraculous cures, while in older times people took a more fatalistic approach. But the major difference, I think, is that Doyle had thought long and hard about his own death, had researched the subject to the best of his ability, had come to certain conclusions that he found both logical and comforting, and was therefore ready to meet his earthly end without bitterness, rancor, denial, or fear.
Wayne, on the other hand, like most people today, simply refused to think about the subject at all, putting it out of his mind and distracting himself with work and travel and recreation and socializing, never pondering the deeper issues that mortality raises. At the end, he was unprepared to face this final challenge, because nothing in his previous life had allowed him to prepare for it. Instead of yielding gracefully to the inevitable, he put up an increasingly painful and pointless fight, denying the facts as long as possible, then belatedly seeking comfort wherever he could find it.
Cicero, as quoted by Montaigne, said, "To study philosophy is nothing but to prepare oneself to die." We moderns have forgotten this ancient wisdom. We ought to remember.
Great post, Michael.
Posted by: Matt Rouge | January 17, 2011 at 07:58 PM
Very well put. I couldn't agree more.
Posted by: Paul | January 17, 2011 at 08:07 PM
I really enjoyed reading this, Michael. Very well said.
Posted by: Kevin | January 17, 2011 at 08:10 PM
I enjoyed that, Michael! No question—as I move on in years (I'm now 63), I hate to imagine what my life (and death) might be like without my Great Spiritual Awakening :o) in the early 1990's.
Great AND completely unexpected, I might add.
Posted by: Bruce Siegel | January 17, 2011 at 08:20 PM
Thanks, Michael! I enjoyed this too.
A friend of mine was diagnosed with terminal cancer about seven years ago. She was one of the few people I had ever told about my NDE back then. I had told her long before she became ill.
I didn't get to see her very often in those last two years, but I flew home as often as I could. No matter how rotten she was feeling, she always made time to see me.
Pat said that I was the only one she could talk about dying with, because I'd already done it. She said that she had to pretend that everything was going to be fine with her family. They couldn't imagine she was going to die at 42. They knew the doctors had to be wrong.
Pat looked forward to dying. She was in terrible pain. She fought to stay as long as she could for her kids sake, but she told me that dying was the one nice thing she was going to do for herself.
I still miss her. I saw her once quite recently. She showed up to say "Hi" very unexpectedly. Then she was off having adventures again.
Posted by: Sandy | January 17, 2011 at 11:55 PM
"Wayne, on the other hand, like most people today, simply refused to think about the subject at all....At the end, he was unprepared to face this final challenge....Instead of yielding gracefully to the inevitable, he put up an increasingly painful and pointless fight, denying the facts as long as possible, then belatedly seeking comfort wherever he could find it."
Your comment that Wayne in this respect was like most people today made me think of the impact on health care. I have heard that a huge portion of all health care costs are spent in something like the last two weeks of life. Thus, besides the more inward costs of denying death, we may be racking up costs that are far more concrete as well.
Posted by: Robert | January 18, 2011 at 04:02 AM
This is what I already posted on Skeptiko:
How beneficial an NDE-account can be is illustrated by the following:
One of my NDE-friends had a very profound NDE when he was in hospital, aged 19. When he was released from hospital he related his story to his parents who dismissed it out of hand (we are talking of a time about 40 years ago -no one had ever heard of NDE's and the like).
A few years ago the mother of my friend was dying and she was terribly scared.
She then remembered what her son had told her so long ago. When he was at her bedside she asked him to tell her about his experience. So he did...
She was relieved. "That is what I wanted to know," she said, and she lost her fear of aproaching death. Later she passed away peacefully.
This says enough.
Posted by: Rudolf Smit | January 18, 2011 at 05:47 AM
Nice post Michael, I still prefer to keep living and not think about dying
Posted by: Jim Winn | January 18, 2011 at 06:31 AM
Can't you do both Jim? :)
Posted by: Paul | January 18, 2011 at 08:53 AM
"Nice post Michael, I still prefer to keep living and not think about dying" - Jim Winn
--------------------------------------------
Have you never lost someone that you really love? Isn't it nice to know that there is high degree of confidence or likelyhood that you might be reunited with that person again? Or they may still be near you and involved in your life and know what and how you are doing? All those milestones in your life that you thought they had missed in actuality they were there? Graduations, births, weddings, etc.? And in the end when it comes your turn to step into the Light your loved ones will be waiting there in the Light to greet you? If Near Death Experiences and Death Bed Visions are to be believed NO ONE DIES ALONE! At some point we are accompanied, guided, and comforted by Angels and the people who loved us. I find that very comforting.
Posted by: Art | January 18, 2011 at 09:56 AM
I think that's a very important point Art. I always surprises me how quickly my conviction fades after reading of apparently evidential phenomena and I become re-submerged in day to day concerns.
I recall reading of a witness to materialisation mediumship who described how, even after seeing the most convincing evidence, over a few days following the sitting, he began to doubt the evidence of his own eyes and experience.
Perhaps in some ways it is an advantage to be a 'seeker after the truth' and to be constantly assessing the evidence we find. Not simply making a final decision and sitting back contented :)
Posted by: Paul | January 18, 2011 at 11:29 AM
"I always surprises me how quickly my conviction fades after reading of apparently evidential phenomena and I become re-submerged in day to day concerns." - Paul
-------------------------------------------
I find it's easier to maintain a certain level of belief since I retired. It gives me more time to read and think and reflect about things. Less worry about day to day concerns!
I am endlessly fascinated by the connection between NDE's and the holographic universe theory and quantum physics and often wonder why other people either can't see it or don't find it that convincing. I'd say about 1/3 of the NDEs I read exhibit this "connectedness" with what Michael Talbot wrote about in The Holographic Universe. How did it happen? They are so divergent and far apart yet if the popular physics books I've read are correct the connection between NDEs and holographic theory and quantum physics is obvious! I find that very convincing and evidential!
For instance, here is an example of the connection between NDE's and the holographic universe theory. This excerpt is from a new NDE posted on the NDERF site.
"I was wondering what was going on when my entire life was presented to me, not as a slide show, but all at once such as on a big screen. It's hard to describe this part because it was like my life was right in front of me all at once." - excerpt from Mary W's NDE, http://www.nderf.org/mary_w_nde.htm
compare the above to,
excerpt from The Universe as a Hologram:
"Unlike normal photographs, every part of a hologram contains all the information possessed by the whole...{snip}...If the apparent separateness of subatomic particles is illusory, it means that at a deeper level of reality all things in the universe are infinitely interconnected. The electrons in a carbon atom in the human brain are connected to the subatomic particles that comprise every salmon that swims, every heart that beats, and every star that shimmers in the sky. Everything interpenetrates everything, and although human nature may seek to categorize and pigeonhole and subdivide, the various phenomena of the universe, all apportionments are of necessity artificial and all of nature is ultimately a seamless web....{snip}... At its deeper level reality is a sort of superhologram in which the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously."
http://www.earthportals.com/hologram.html
Or "All at once!" Fantastic!
Posted by: Art | January 18, 2011 at 12:17 PM
"I'm now 63"
I remember when 63 sounded old! Since turning 50, I find this is no longer true. On the other hand, 25 now seems ridiculously young!
"I still prefer to keep living and not think about dying"
It's good to keep living, but if you were to spend a little time thinking about dying, you might find that the prospect becomes less disturbing. Often things seem scary or troubling only because we try not to think about them.
"I have heard that a huge portion of all health care costs are spent in something like the last two weeks of life."
Trouble is, in some cases a seemingly terminal condition can be reversed. Doctors are caught in a dilemma. They don't want to "flog" a dying patient, but they also don't want to give up prematurely. It's a tough call. I'm glad I don't have to make it.
Posted by: Michael Prescott | January 18, 2011 at 12:19 PM
I suspect there is a balance to be struck between not thinking about death and becoming obsessed by it. Since it is certain to happen to us all, and (most of us) do not know where we are in the 'queue', it seems to me that fear is one of the main reasons for avoiding proper consideration of the issues. This is probably one reason why so few people make a Will for instance.
Though it can be hard, it is important to face our fears in a constructive way if we can. Often what we fear turns out not to be as bad as we thought (though sometimes I guess it can be worse - ask my accountant).
I often remember a quote from the film Dune "Fear is the mind killer, the little death".
Posted by: Paul | January 18, 2011 at 12:34 PM
"Since it is certain to happen to us all, and (most of us) do not know where we are in the 'queue', it seems to me that fear is one of the main reasons for avoiding proper consideration of the issues." - Paul
--------------------------------------------
It is not necessarily my own death that concerns me but the death of those whom I love. It's not the ones who die who suffer but the loved ones we leave behind. If I was under the impression that I would never see again all of those whom I have loved and lost life would be rather dismal. The older you get the more family and friends you will outlive. We can only hope that when Pam Reynolds said she saw a number of her departed relatives that it was "real." Stories about meeting up with departed relatives and friends is one of my favorite things about near death experiences and death bed visions.
Posted by: Art | January 18, 2011 at 02:43 PM
Weirdly enough, this makes me think of the people of ancient Egypt - a culture I find fascinating and whose people I admire a great deal. The Egyptians built their whole world around the reality of death and made it the central focus of their religion - yet they were also a people who loved life and celebration. They loved to play games and have parties and even took pleasure in their everyday jobs. Their outlook was not morbid at all, and their very intimate awareness of death did not at all cloud their delight in life. They believed that when they died, providing the proper rituals were observed, they would go onto enjoy an afterlife in which they basically continued the same life they lived on earth, only in more perfect and peaceful conditions, without the accompanying suffering.
To think about death and come to the conclusion, based on a reasonable amount of evidence, that it is not something to dread, does not mean that one is obsessed with the macabre and unable to enjoy living. In fact, my research into NDEs and related phenomena gave me hope and renewed my will to live at a time when that will was thin indeed. I can enjoy life to the fullest and stop taking things quite so seriously.
Posted by: Jane B | January 18, 2011 at 03:34 PM
I think it can be paradoxical: back when I was an atheist/materialist I thought death was The End. So you'd think I would have had an attitude of "enjoy life, experience as much as you can, because you only have a little bit of time". But instead, more often than not I found myself just "marking time", sleepwalking through life. If everything is utterly meaningless, and everything you do will just fade away, what's the real point of doing anything? All your supposed accomplishments are just as ephemeral as you are.
It's only after I came to believe in life after death that I found myself free to enjoy this one. SInce we do have a purpose here - to learn what this world has to teach us - I find I want to do as much as possible, to learn every lesson. And when it ends, it ends.
Posted by: jimbo | January 18, 2011 at 04:04 PM
Stories about meeting up with departed relatives and friends is one of my favorite things about near death experiences and death bed visions.
Better still is actually communicating with those who have made the transition and are happily enjoying their life in the spirit world.
Posted by: Zerdini | January 18, 2011 at 04:25 PM
John Wayne's final days I think can be eclipsed by what Steve McQueen went through when he was closed to death. McQueen died in Mexico after going down there to perform surgery to remove cancer from his body since all the doctors back in the US said there was nothing they could do. It appears at least John Wayne right at the very end came to accept death, McQueen pretty much fought to the bitter end and may have probably died thinking he would live.
jimbo, I some what agree with the way you see life, in that everything you do seems in vain if it is all supposed to disappear eventually as the way materialists see it. I'm also not just talking about your own personal death, but the death of everyone else here (and everyone that has yet to exist on here) and the ultimate end of the universe which science to this point says is inevitable. I find (and this is just my opinion I should note) some of the major beliefs in humanism come off as a form of denial, such as the idea the human race will always continue or you will have kids to live on through you (I admit humanism does not explicitly say this, but there seems to be a lot of implications that the above two will be true).
Posted by: Aftrbrnr | January 18, 2011 at 06:02 PM
Great post Micheal. As a lover of Sir Doyle and his work, it doesn't surprise me in the least that he met his death with such courage and equanimity.
I think it's become worse and worse, at least in the U.S., an idea almost that death doesn't happen to "us"--maybe to those "other people," but not us. And sometimes I almost think there's a belief that technology will delay our deaths almost forever. Sad, because it really sets people up for a lot of pain.
Posted by: Kathleen | January 18, 2011 at 07:19 PM
Speaking of John Wayne... My mom used to be a salad woman at "Buffum's" in Costa Mesa, (or Santa Ana?), California. Buffum's was a department store but they also had a cafeteria and my mom worked there making salads for people. She came home from work one time and told me that John Wayne had come in to the store and eaten one of her salad's. She was quite proud.
My mom died in 1968 when I was 15 years old. I will soon be 58 years old. It was a LONG time ago. I was a real momma's boy! I cried for three days when she died. To this day it was the most horrible thing that has ever happened to me. I still think about and miss her almost every day.
Posted by: Art | January 18, 2011 at 07:54 PM
"I am endlessly fascinated by the connection between NDE's and the holographic universe theory and quantum physics and often wonder why other people either can't see it or don't find it that convincing."
Art—I, for one, AM fascinated by this and I do find the connection compelling. And when I read "The Holographic Universe" back in about 1994, I loved it.
But why do you keep making the same point here?
Posted by: Bruce Siegel | January 18, 2011 at 10:09 PM
"But why do you keep making the same point here?" - Bruce
-----------
I think I have a touch of Asperger's. I get stuck on things.
Posted by: Art | January 19, 2011 at 06:08 AM
"I think I have a touch of Asperger's. I get stuck on things."
Well, I don't know if you do or don't, Art, but I appreciate your not getting defensive, or being mad. That's what I was afraid of, and your response has completely disarmed me.
But if you do have "a touch of Asperger's," maybe you're the lucky one. I didn't know a thing about this syndrome until recently. I just saw two movies about aspies (as they call themselves), and each of those guys ended up with an impossibly beautiful woman.
So where do I sign up? I get stuck too on things too—a lot.
By the way, your posts that don't include the "H word" are usually warm, down-to-earth, and a pleasure to read.
Posted by: Bruce Siegel | January 19, 2011 at 08:21 AM
I've taken several online tests for Asperger's and I score pretty high on them.
When I did my student teaching the supervising teacher said I ignored the students and didn't pay attention to them. I just stood up at the board and droned on while the students sat there bored. When I actually taught Physical Science for a year and half I had exactly the same problem. I was a horrible teacher. The kids ignored me. I always thought I wanted to be a teacher because I love to read and learn, and in fact in the actual Education courses in College I made straight A's, but when it came to actually being in the classroom I was a dismal failure. I'm thinking that it might have something to do with that "touch of Asperger's" thing.
Posted by: Art | January 19, 2011 at 10:39 AM
"I just saw two movies about aspies (as they call themselves), and each of those guys ended up with an impossibly beautiful woman." - Bruce
-----------------------------------------
LOL! I think my wife is beautiful. We've been married for 36 years.
Art's wife:
http://www.belmont.edu/communication/faculty/more_about_bonnie_riechert.html
Posted by: Art | January 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM
"I was a horrible teacher."
I don't think I could survive five minutes teaching in a classroom, but over the years, I HAVE learned to teach one-on-one. I teach music (piano) to people of all ages, and in general, I enjoy it—sometimes immensely.
But my point—and it's a poignant one—is that my work has been a godsend to me, because there were times in my life that the only relationships I could make any sense of were the ones I had with my students.
Happily, that's changing! Still no wife, though, but hey, I'm only 63. :o)
Posted by: Bruce Siegel | January 19, 2011 at 01:17 PM
I wonder how much equanimity in death depends on adopting a survivalist belief system. Perhaps seriously engaging the question is sufficient?
Posted by: Hrvoje Butkovic | January 19, 2011 at 02:48 PM
Yes Art, your wife is beautiful! Thanks for showing.
Posted by: Ben | January 19, 2011 at 02:50 PM
When I call my beloved my better half I'm not being facetious! My older sister says "you married well." I met her in Church when we were in College at the University of Georgia. The Church was right across the street from Campus and there were a lot of college age kids that went there. It was a lot of fun. I don't drink alcohol, or smoke, or do illegal drugs so of course I wanted a wife with the same lifestyle. When I was young I used to actually pray to God to help me find a wife. I sort of believe it worked!
Posted by: Art | January 19, 2011 at 03:05 PM
Michael,
A very interesting post. John Wayne's final days reminded me of those of a close relative, who, like Wayne, found very little comfort in the teachings of religion.
As for the person who said he would prefer not to think about dying or death, I like the way William James put it:
"The luster of the present hour is always borrowed from the background of possibilities it goes with. Let our common experiences be enveloped in an eternal moral order; let our suffering have an immortal significance; let Heaven smile upon the earth, and deities pay their visits; let faith and hope be the atmosphere which man breathes in; and his days pass by with zest; they stir with prospects, they thrill with remoter values. Place around them on the contrary the curdling cold and gloom and absence of all permanent meaning which for pure naturalism and the popular-science evolutionism of our time are all that is visible ultimately, and the thrill stops short, or turns rather to an anxious trembling.”
Posted by: Michael Tymn | January 19, 2011 at 11:05 PM
Art's wife:
http://www.belmont.edu/communication/faculty/more_about_bonnie_riechert.
Aye, she's a bonnie lass!
Posted by: Zerdini | January 20, 2011 at 12:55 PM
It's interesting being 'ridiculously young' as Michael put it (24) yet I place SO much time pondering death, researching life after death, and having a somewhat secret, side career as a spiritual journalist.
I just don't have fear of death like other people do. It makes me feel like I'm on the wrong planet sometimes. The only thing I fear are other people's ignorance and fear of death.
Posted by: Cyrus | January 22, 2011 at 04:51 AM
There are only two aspects of death I know I don't like:
1) If I were to die a little too early, leaving my friends and loved ones behind. That brings about such a terrible feeling inside. I have no problem contemplating death, but I would say the people I like to be around with are a major reason I live, and if I were to die from something other than natural causes, I'd feel pretty crabby knowing how heavily it'd affect my loved ones and friends, especially.
2) The reverse: my friends and loved ones dying :(
Posted by: Ronnie Lee | January 22, 2011 at 05:37 AM