IMG_2361
Blog powered by Typepad

« God's train set | Main | Who killed Brienne Cross? »

Comments

What! Could Infinite have multiple thoughts that create multiple universes? Of course probably infinite universes.

Interesting video, but I don't see how the satellite will be able to capture images of a parent universe, if the parent universe is outside the parameters of our own reality.

But if scientists can indeed prove this, more power to them. Time will tell.

They will be able to "see" parallel universes because gravity and other some fundamental particles like the steril neutrinos can sips through the hyper dimensions into our 3D world ... or so they say.

Theoretical physicist are an imaginative bunch. As an example here is note of another search for the visitors from another dimensions here on Earth --without the need of WMAP or LISA satellites:
http://tinyurl.com/y9xp6mm

A friend of mine mentioned 2012 last night to me and it's the first I heard about it so I jumped on here out of curiosity. I think it's kind of sick and sounds like a bunch of skeptical jargon.
I choose to live every day like it is the last because let's be real, WHO THE HELL KNOWS what is going to happen or when it's your time to go on. The past is history, the future is a mystery and now is a gift, thats why it's called the present. It's not healthy to sit around and trip out about when you will die. Stop wasting your time you have now.
http://2012earth.net/your_new_chakra_system.html>earth 2012
- some truth about 2012

Hello again. My second comment and last comment is directed to the woman that often writes here about "real" seances. Especially one i remember about some loved one that materialised into a spirit body that could be touched like you can touch another fleshy human being. This kind of dainty fantasy is not science, it is not life in general, and it is simply untrue.

I recently read a thread on this site about the Medium David something-or-other that doesn't allow infrared cameras into his seance rooms. This kind of masking of evidence would not happen if the "ghosts" involved were scientists or people like Arthur Conan Doyle. It is simply preposterous to believe in this kind of whimsical fancy.

So i bid you audieu with the PS remind yourselves of replicables. Eh Thank you (dave has left the building)

Dave,
As a scientist, when I'm describing a situation I try to be more specific than using terms like "David something-or-other". Why not be polite and address the poster you are referring to directly? And why is it so difficult to know what/who you are talking about? Couldn't you be bothered to read the posts before commenting?

If you are trying to present yourself as an informed skeptic, you are doing a lousy job at it.

Hi dave, you're probably talking about David Thompson. I find it interesting that your tone implies that people who read this blog believe in the Thompson seances, Michael Prescott and most of this blogs readers have been very critical of Thompson. (Use the search function on the left side of the page if you want to see what transpired). Michael has actually received some insults from at least one "believer" who didn't like Michael criticizing the problems with David Thompson, and Michael even consulted escape artists to see what forms of deception that Thompson could have perpetuated.

You'll find that there is even a medium that at one time read this blog (Marcel Cairo) that is skeptical of things such as materialization mediumship (Marcel even values the need for mediums to be tested, something I praise him for). To come on here and imply everyone here believes in materialization mediumship is a sweeping generalization, maybe if you read up on the blog's archive your opinion may change.

Saying that David Thompson is a real Materialization Medium is pretty much like saying the Tooth Fairy exists, Don't ask William Cadwell about his earthly existence too because that won't get you anywhere.

Don't criticise Mr Thompson in front of Victor Zammit though or he will have you shot on the spot. ;)

Seems to me like this Dave guy has chosen the easiest target in this case so no points for you sorry Dave, Back to Skeptic school you go.

If you are trying to present yourself as an informed skeptic, you are doing a lousy job at it.

An uninformed skeptic more likely!

Saying that David Thompson is a real Materialization Medium is pretty much like saying the Tooth Fairy exists, Don't ask William Cadwell about his earthly existence too because that won't get you anywhere.

Very true! David Thompson has stated that he is NOT a materialization medium and he is absolutely right. What transpires in his seances bears no resemblance to a genuine materialisation seance.

Very few people have ever been to a materialization seance - including Marcel Cairo - yet they pontificate as though they have.

To illuminate what is and is not provable, I recommend a very famous paper in the philosophy of science, "Two Dogmas of Empiricism."

http://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html

The comments to this entry are closed.