IMG_2361
Blog powered by Typepad

« It's just me | Main | The spectrum »

Comments

Of course none of this should happen at with a dying brain.

When I cut the power to my lamp , the bulb doesn't become super bright it goes off.

If I reduce the power to my lamp the light is less dim, not brighter.

I will challenge the procurement of one thing that becomes more functional when you reduce or remove power to it.

Common sense would state when a body is shutdown the brain should stop being conscious. The fact that NDErs are clearly conscious, in their words super conscious, and can describe what is going on around them accurately ought to be a strong hint this isn't happening in the brain, but what do I know?

In all fairness, there is some evidence that the brain does light up in the instant before dying:

http://snipurl.com/shbrq

I don't think this explains the whole NDE phenomenon by any means, but there may be some connection.

I enjoyed the post Michael. I'd already seen that link to the "dying brain lights up" article and it intrigued me. Primarily because that kind of finding could just as easily prove that the "mind" is going somewhere as the brain dies, as it could disprove it.

The 360 degree vision in some NDEs intrigue me. Has anyone conducted studies on enhanced cognitive senses during NDEs? I remember reading an NDE on a public forum long ago where someone who lost their sense of smell in the physical world retained it during the experience, and I have read a few NDEs where people could apparently hear sounds and notes unheard of from this world.

That's funny, Michael—I'm in the middle of re-reading Lessons from the Light too. It's one of my favorite books, and almost certainly my favorite book on NDE's—and I have a lot!

I particularly like the way Ring stands back for long stretches and allows the experiencers to have their say without interruption.The chapters on the life review are particularly compelling.

Though I understand that Ring stopped writing about the subject because he felt he ran out of new stuff to say, it makes me a bit sad.

Great post, Michael.
I'm familiar with all of these cases and they never fail to impress,second,third,fourth time around.
I remember an episode of the Phil Donahue show in the mid eighties I think it was,devoted to NDErs. There was Jackie Nink Pflug(shot in the back of the head on the hijacked Egyptian airliner.) Tom Sawyer,crushed under his own truck when the tarmac gave way on his drive.Violet Horton,collapsed during gall bladder complications. There was a vietnam vet(can't remember his name )shot in the chest..real nice guy,as they all were.He couldn't find anyone to believe his experience,so he went to the bookstore to look for Moody's book,and couldn't find it,until it fell off the top of a shelf and hit him on the head.
Then there was Kristle Murzlock who Morse resustitated in Pocatelle(I think).While she was recounting her story I remember being impressed with how convincing she was.She's been interviewed several times subsequently, as most of them have.The recollections never change.

Here is an interesting post on CNN about the brain:

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/10/12/woman.brain/index.html

This is off topic and I'm sorry if it was mentioned elsewhere I haven't been keeping up lately but...


Nobel prize winner Brian Josepheon has joined SCEPCOP (the anti-pseudo-skeptic site).

http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/

Does csicop have any Nobel prize winners?

Michael Prescott, have you considered joining too?

I'm not much of a joiner, I'm afraid. But congratulations to them for acquiring the support of Prof. Josephson.

Does anyone know what Ring's current position on the NDE is?

Michael, I really enjoyed your post. Personally I'm not that convinced anymore of the evidentiality of NDE/OBE phenomena. Of course the data from AWARE will be a significant contribution, but recent developments in neuroscience, for example, the study that revealed 30 seconds of intense brain activity before death, alluded to above, and recent well argumented cases for the Dying Brain hypothesis (see link), all appear to weaken the evidence, or at least take the shine off somewhat. Much better evidence comes from mediumship and reincarnation research.
The link is here:
http://www.ukskeptics.com/pdf/dying-brain.pdf

Hey Michael

If I was you I would read Sabom's Dying to Live and the more recent Irreducible Mind. They discuss the arguments used by Braithewaite and show why they are flawed. In particular I would recommend Sabom's book cause it will show that these arguments are nothing really new and have been throughly debunked. Braithewaite is quibbling and nothing more. Okay lets say some brain activity remains, is it enough to be conscious in any meaningful way. No it's not. In the same way some cells in a corpse don't die immediately we do not consider the person to be alive anymore.

In the end has the author explained how people can accurately describe their surgery? No

Has he explained why the blind have visual based NDEs? No

I think you get my point. Nothing wrong with reading skeptical stuff such as Braithewaite and Augustine but don't let them trick you into losing sight of the big picture of NDEs. Talk with people who have had the experience.

I do agree with you though, I think reincarnation is the best way to go. You cannot play quibble games with it.

Michael,for goodness sake,what has thirty seconds of second or fifth rate brain activity got to do with witnessing the events of one's own grisly heart operation.
Your not convinced. That's okay.
Where was the study on the dying person conducted by the way,and how did they know when he/she was dead?

I forgot to mention. I loved how Braithewaite himself nearly became dead from a stroke at the idea of dualism. The guy is worse then a religious fundy.

One thing interesting to me about the case of the nine month old boy is that at nine months, he wouldn't know how to say much of anything. But during the NDE, he was apparently able to communicate and understand what was being said to him. Not only that, at five, he was apparently able to translate that understanding into words.

Another thing of interest to me are the NDErs who describe how vivid everything was during their experience. I think that is more evidence that the spirit self is our highest self. It seems our brain's interpretations of what we see and hear around us is restricted to the limitations of our eyes and ears. Our spirit self probably soaks up all the vivid information we see and hear, but humanity doesn't seem to know - or has forgotten - how to access all of this detailed information. During an NDE though,it seems that spirits no longer confined to the limitations of body are able to fully experience a larger spectrum of reality. I don't know if I would go so far as to say that we are spirits 'trapped' in human bodies; I think it may be that experiencing life in a human body is an intended part of development, or we may have just forgotten how to access the full spectrum our spirit self is able to observe.

I sometimes wonder if the bio-magnetic energy fields around us are either our spirit selves, or an effect given off by our spirit selves. I also wonder if the 'electrical' currents flowing through our brains are not the result of 'brain activity' itself, but the result of our brain being operated by those 'electrical' currents. In other words, perhaps the brain is like a set of buttons, and the 'electrical' currents are like a set of fingers. If so, then it makes sense that the physical body would cease to operate once the 'fingers' move away from the 'buttons'.

"Does anyone know what Ring's current position on the NDE is?"

As far as I know, dm, Ring no longer writes on the NDE nor is he even active in the NDE community. In fact, he wrote an update for the 2006 softcover edition in which he completely dismisses the entire phenomenon.

Just kidding. As of that update, he was as enthusiastic as ever.

That should have read: 2006 softcover edition of Lessons from the Light.

Last time I saw Moody he was trying to come up with someway of trainning people so that they would be better able to communicate the experience of an NDE (if they were to have one)
Does anyone know what I'm referring to? What has come of this?

This is the latest on his website:

New Message from Dr. Moody

People at the bedside of the dying often report extraordinary spiritual experiences. The bystanders feel that they empathically co-live the dying experience of the person who passes away. I am working on a research project on these empathic or shared death experiences, for future publication. If you would be willing to share your experience with me,please email me at [email protected]. I would be deeply appreciative. Please include your phone number,so I can call you. Strict confidentiality is assured.
With kind regards,
Raymond Moody, MD, Ph.D

Some years ago, I read a press release describing a Raymond Moody, Paul Perry,book Reunions(visionary encounters with departed loved ones)as a groundbreaking must read. So I eagerly bought it and then discovered that Moody had actually built a psychomanteum and was offering grieving relatives the chance to mirror gaze(Ancient Greek Style)until their loved ones 'appeared.'
That's okay though, I thought. I'll give it a chance.
Moody duly reported that deceased relatives had indeed popped out of the mirror,but infuriatingly,instead of revealing some golden nuggets of wisdom,all they said was.."I'm fine,just fine...don't worry I'm fine.
I liked Life after Life,it was what got this aspect of the paranormal rolling, but not much else has been forthcoming.

Regarding NDEs in the blind, I really enjoyed his book, 'Mindsight'. I consider it a classic amongst my NDE book collection. There are stories of NDEs wherein the blind born that way since birth have veridical visions in which color is "perceived." Fascinating.

"Moody duly reported that deceased relatives had indeed popped out of the mirror,but infuriatingly,instead of revealing some golden nuggets of wisdom,all they said was.."I'm fine,just fine...don't worry I'm fine.""

Steve, if someone you loved died, and life seemed unbearable at times because you felt you'd never see them again, what message could be possibly be more meaningful?

Or, if you were just afraid of your own death, as we all are to some extent, it's still a pretty cool thing to hear.

I think Reunions WAS a groundbreaking book because it presented actual steps one could take to facilitate contact with the dead, no special psychic talents required. (And neatly tied in Moody's present-day attempts with ancient historical techniques, which made it even more interesting and plausible.)

Induced After-Death Communication, which Michael discussed here, is quite similar in many ways

Bruce,
The book was trumpeted as a groundbreaking connection into the secrets of the afterlife. But no secrets were revealed.

If my dead Father...and the fourteen dead members of his/my family strode out of a psychomanteum and 'only' told me...that they were just fine, I truly believe I would attempt to join the Internet Infidels. Fortunately,I'm sure they wouldn't have me.

Um Steve

I think the dead reporting they are fine is pretty momentous so why get upset that is all they had to say.

"There was no blurriness in my vision whatsoever." - excerpt from Craig's NDE

It's common for near death experiencers to relate that what they percieved was "realer than real". I've often wondered how it was that person's perception could be "more real" or "more consciousness than normal? I believe I've figured out what is going on. There is an inherent blurriness in a holographic projection. We live in the holographic projection, and near death experiencers are able to percieve the holographic film from which our reality derives. If you know how a hologram is generated this will make perfect sense to you. Compare the above quote to this comment from a recent article in New Scientist about the holographic nature of the Universe.

"Or, to put it another way, a holographic universe is blurry," says Hogan."
www.crystalinks.com/holouniverse1.html

And by the way, being able to focus on the entire picture or image, and seeing each thread, and things far away appearing just as clear as close up are more connections between the holographic nature of the universe and near death experiences. There is no way that the average person that has an NDE would know this, but it appears over and over again in NDE descriptions. There is a connection or parallels between NDEs and quantum physics and the holographic universe theory that can not be easily explained away and I find this to be very evidential, just as much if nor more so then the evidential material.

Hi, Art! Good to have you back!

Art -

you would probably really enjoy reading the Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot.

It's a really good book - and it's got lots and lots of stuff about holograms, too.

I think it's possible Art may have already read that book.

Just a guess.

I think it's possible Art may have already read that book. - Michael Prescott
----------------------------

ROFLMAO! The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot is my Holy Bible! I have read all three of Talbot's books, Mysticism and the New Physics, Beyond the Quantum, and The Holographic Universe twice. I have "studied" the Holographic Universe like it was divinely inspired!

"The 360 degree vision in some NDEs intrigue me." - Ronnie
-------------------------

In a holographic piece of film each piece contains the whole, everything interpenetrates everything, and everything is infinitely connected to everything else. After the soul leaves the body it enters into some kind of strange "holographic" universe where the soul literally feels like it fills the whole universe. Whatever the soul focuses it's attention on is what it experiences. If you think of the Civil War you will be there in 1860's, at the battle of Gettysburg or wherever you wish to go. If you think of Neandertals and the glacial times in Europe you will be there watching and experiencing what it was like to be a Neandertal 50,000 years ago. Or I suppose you could even think about the Cretaceous and dinosaurs and you would be there absorbing all the information about that time period. Once the soul leaves the body it is no longer limited by time or space. It's a holographic universe thing.

NDE's and Time:
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/research13.html

The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot is my Holy Bible!

Art, do you know if other researchers have continued the works of Talbot, or refined or modified his conclusions?

Art, do you know if other researchers have continued the works of Talbot, or refined or modified his conclusions? - Zetetic_chick
--------------------------------------

Recently there was a really neat article in New Scientist online magazine about this static these scientist found who were looking for gravity waves or something. But it didn't exactly fit that but this other guy (Hogan?) had done some calculations and it fit perfectly with some stuff he was working on. He said it he thought it could be proof of the holographic nature of our universe.

“It looks like GEO600 is being buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time,” says Hogan. He adds: “”If the GEO600 result is what I suspect it is, then we are all living in a giant cosmic hologram.”

http://www.inquisitr.com/15460/scientists-claim-our-world-may-be-a-giant-hologram/

It's like everything else in life some people think Michael Talbot was a prophet and other people think he was a quack. Some people hate The Holographic Universe and other people think it was incredibly profound. "Duality" (and separation) seem to be inherent and inescapable properties of the physical universe.

For me it's not any one piece of evidence that make me a believer, it's the sum total, or aggregate that point me in the direction that this universe and this life isn't quite what our senses tells us it is. It's like a puzzle framed by quantum physics and the holographic universe theory on the edge and filling in the inside you got pieces of the puzzle like near death experiences, death bed visions, EVP, and the work of some Mediums. I don't know if you've ever seen George Anderson give a reading but he's pretty dad gum amazing. I've seen him a few times in TV and he's even better than John Edward.

I am continually blown away by the connection between NDE's and quantum physics an the holographic universe theory. It's the parallels between the two that I find so evidential for both of them. I am also a huge fan of death bed visions. They fill me with so much hope. They make death seem so compassionate. No one dies alone.

We had a little boy at our Church, Chase, with lymphoma that was dying who at one o'clock in the morning saw angels in the room. Some of his relatives were in the room and Chase said to them "do ya'll see all the angels in the room?" A couple hours later at 4:00 am he died.

Moody was talking about the 'shared NDE' as well when I saw him. Thanks for the update- I wasn't aware of his website.
Odd...
He also talked about the psychomanteum. As I understand it, one of the problems was (is) that people go expecting to visit one person, and often it's someone else that shows up--

Add shared NDEs (the ones where at least two people are experiencing an NDE at once and are able to communicate or remember the experience) to my list of interesting aspects of the experience. I think some of these bits of the NDE are often overshadowed, and I'd really like to see more research on these. Granted, attempting to research something like a shared NDE would be really difficult, as they don't seem to happen that often.

Kris said..'I think the dead reporting they are fine is pretty momentous so why get upset that is all they had to say'

Kris,I didn't get upset,I just didn't finish the book. If you went to a medium to get some information about your dead relatives,would you be happy with,"There telling me there just fine,just fine."

Of course it's impressive if a dead relative walks out of a mirror, but the reader only has the authors word that had actually happened. Surely if there was genuine contact made, the spirits would give us ittle more information to help our cause.

Does anyone have any shared NDE accounts?

I think I would be happy if it was clearly them telling me through the mirror. I think we both had something else in mind.

I’m often amazed at how ordinary my experiences with ghosts seem sometimes. They don’t typically say anything really enlightening. But then again, most people I meet on the street don’t either. Think about what your last conversation with your best friend or mom was like. It is the very mundane stuff of life that seems to connect us with our families. It isn’t so much what ghosts have to say that seems important, it almost seems like what they make us feel is the big deal.

Sometimes when I talk to my Grandma, I wonder why we talk about ordinary stuff going on in my life when she could tell me about where she is. She says that words don’t work any better to explain her experience than they work to explain my NDE. The best she can do is to help me meet her part way to get a taste of her way of being. I’ve never been able to carry that back here very well. I understand it when I’m there, but not when I’m here. The only part that really makes it back is some of the feelings. Really peaceful, and bigger somehow. And so loved.

Sometimes when I talk to my Grandma, I wonder why we talk about ordinary stuff going on in my life when she could tell me about where she is. - Sandy
-------------------------------

The physics of the Spiritual Universe may be so different in kind from this physical universe that we may not be able to understand it (or believe it) even if they were to tell us what it is like.

We only understand that which we have some experience with. If someone from the distant future came and started explaining to me how trans-dimensional warp drives in Star ships work I'm not sure I'd be able to understand it because I have no basic knowledge in my brain about it.

And that concept may have a whole lot to do with "why we are here." It may simply be impossible for a soul or spirit to grasp what it is like to live in a physical universe or a universe where time and space and sepation exists without first having spent some time living in it.

"The world is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." - J.B.S. Haldane

He also talked about the psychomanteum

I tried the psychomanteum as explained in one of Moody's books for a few weeks and it didn't work.

I seem to be recalcitrant or resistent to having direct experience any kind of paranormal phenomena.

I'd like to have a direct experience of something like that, specially of phenomena suggesting survival.

I guess that "spirits" don't appear to me because perhaps they know I have a long list of questions (some of them technical: philosophical, scientific, spiritual, etc) to make them!

So they will have to think it twice before of "visiting" me.

Lol.

PS.
1-Has anybody here attempted the technique of psychomanteum with positive results?

2-For Zerdini, and as an off-topic question, have you had direct experience with so-called "Psychic Surgeons"?

I tend to be very skeptical of psychic surgeons, it's hard to believe they can to make elaborate and "major" surgeries (like extirpating a tumour) and don't leave any scar on the skin, specially when they're manipulating biological tissues.

As they're supposedly doing a mechanical operation (supposedly, mediated by spiritual means) one would expect some evidence of mechanical surgical-like after-effects on the patients' bodies.

But this is a field that I haven't studied in depth, so perhaps my opinion is ill-informed.

Perhaps Vitor knows or has researched something about it too, because some famous psychic surgeons are from Brazil (like Ze Arigo)

What I find really fascinating about reading the comments on this blog, are the rich diversity of experiences, and most probably....the various levels of "belief", or comitment to the idea that we really do survive physical death.

For example - I LOVE reading Zerdini's accounts of the spiritual stuff that he's encountered through the years, yet.....I don't believe that there were actual physical manifestations of ethereal beings that were procured through the mediumship of alec harris....or really any medium out there anywhere..:-)

It becomes a difficult hurdle to high jump at some point - what sort of speaks to you on a gut level and rings true...and what, all respect aside, sort of compels you to believe that something else a bit equally as odd - but not quite as advertised - was taking place.

I guess we all have our boggle threshold..:-)

I'm curious where others draw the line that they WANT to cross, but for some odd reason can't make the leap?

FWIW - I tend to believe in the authenticity of the narratives - or the stories so to speak from everyone who comments on here regularly.

But while I certainly believe that there are FAR more than "one white crow" out there in the wild, I tend to think that most of the stories on here, especially the ones that tend to "define" the life experience of those leaving the comments, are far more easily explained by more ordinary, or even textbook style answers than those emanating from ethereal realms..:-)

ZC-
There are a few places near where I live that use the psychomanteum set-up. Apparently the success rate is good (they continue and most people are satisfied) I don't know they publish exact results.
Moody did not claim that these were visitations from dead people, only that they often helped people overcome grief. That is the purpose he suggested they were useful for- overcoming grief in the living.

I have had 'paranormal' experiences too numerous to remember- reading "Irreducible Mind" was like a homecoming for me.
But they never come when I try...

Hi Art! Nice to see you back.
=)

Moody did not claim that these were visitations from dead people, only that they often helped people overcome grief

It's true, sonic.

I read Moody's book on psychomanteum several years ago. As far I remember, he said it was to overcome grief, but his book seemed to me somehow ambiguous... in some parts he writes as if real, external spiritual phenomena is the basis of the experiences or of some of them.

In any case, it was with that intention that I tried to test the psychomanteum. I didn't have any grief, only curiosity.

Perhaps I need to read again that book, or newers ones on psychomanteum.

I have had 'paranormal' experiences too numerous

Can you share some of the most impressive ones? Some of them pointing out to survival?

Thanks

ZC asked:" For Zerdini, and as an off-topic question, have you had direct experience with so-called "Psychic Surgeons"?"

It has been mentioned on here before. The most impressive was George Chapman who was controlled by a former eye surgeon, William Lang.

Felipe wrote:

For example - I LOVE reading Zerdini's accounts of the spiritual stuff that he's encountered through the years, yet.....I don't believe that there were actual physical manifestations of ethereal beings that were procured through the mediumship of alec harris....or really any medium out there anywhere..:-)

Thank you for that but frankly I am not bothered whether people believe it or not - personal testimony constantly contradicts theory!

I would probably be in the same situation as you if I hadn't seen it myself.

I have not even the slightest doubt we survive the death of the physical body and that it is possible to communicate with our loved ones who have preceded us.

It has been mentioned on here before. The most impressive was George Chapman who was controlled by a former eye surgeon, William Lang.

Thanks, Zerdini. I didn't remember that you have already commented about it before. Now I remember it, it was some months ago.

I'll search more information about Chapman.

Most cases of "psychic surgeons" I've read are from Brazil and Philippines, and it seems to me they're not very reliable.

I remember only one of them (a philippine man) who was tested in well-controlled conditions, but I didn't remember his name right now.

Hi Art! Nice to see you back. =) - Sandy
----------------------

Thanks, I was taking a break. All of the "life after death" and NDE blogs drew me back. I couldn't help myself. I'm still singing the same old tune though. I am still me. I am sorry to say though that the truth is that I really don't have anything new to add.

It's the same song I've been singing for the last 9 years. This is one of my favorite songs.

Your Still You - Josh Groban

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVHNHvkf0Ss

Josh Groban sounds like how I imagine how angels must sound. I think this song has spiritual implications, like after we die "your still you."


Hi, Art! Don't forget Josh's "To Where You Are" too! A very beautiful schmaltzy afterlife tearjerker.

I do swoon for that boy. :-)

“But while I certainly believe that there are FAR more than "one white crow" out there in the wild,”

This is not what James meant by the one white crow story. One paranormal phenomenon that has valid evidence is the one white crow that makes materialism ancient history like the flat earth belief.

Hi, Art! Don't forget Josh's "To Where You Are" too! A very beautiful schmaltzy afterlife tearjerker. I do swoon for that boy. :-) - Ginny
--------------------------------------------

It's so weird. When I hear Josh Groban sing I get tears in my eyes. His voice is incredible. It's perfect. It's like an incredible gift. When I hear his voice I honestly think that must be how angels sound when they sing? I wonder what kind of person he is in real life? I've seen him interviewed on different shows and he seems to be a really nice guy. Anyway, Whew! What a voice!

The comments to this entry are closed.