It's always been standard practice for "physical" or materialization mediums to be restrained in some way during their performance. This is an attempt to ensure that in the darkness of the seance room, they will not impersonate the very spirits they are claiming to summon forth.
Sometimes the tactic backfires. The Davenport Brothers were a well-known pair of 19th century materialization mediums who traveled the country displaying their skills. They would allow volunteers from the audience to tie them up with strong rope inside the curtained "cabinet" that was used, allegedly, to concentrate their their spiritual energies. But on one occasion they apparently encountered a knot they could not undo. Answers.com tells us:
In Liverpool ... two members selected from the audience tied the mediums with a peculiarly intricate knot. The mediums protested that it was unfairly tight and injured their circulation. A doctor from the audience made an examination and pronounced against them. The Davenports refused to sit and asked Ferguson to cut the knot. The next night a riot broke out and the party left town. At Hull, Huddersfield, and Leeds they found a hostile public, inclined to lynch them. Since they did not find the police protection sufficient, they broke off their engagements....
The general conclusion regarding the Davenport brothers' phenomena is that their performance was simple stage conjuring. Trick cabinets and rope tying were standard items of stage magic at the time, and Harry Houdini and his students demonstrated feats equal to and surpassing those of the Davenports. The brothers' refusal to continue with a performance in England when their wrists were tied too tightly argues against spirit agency, since this should have operated even in such unfavorable circumstances considering other marvels that were demonstrated. They escaped any exposure of trickery though, in spite of observation by alert and intelligent investigators (which other mediums also accomplished only to be caught later), and their release from binding with strong ropes was phenomenally rapid—often taking only two or three minutes.
It should be pointed out that many aficionados of the Davenports still reject "the general conclusion" that the brothers were fakes.
Today, materialization mediumship is much rarer than it was in the 19th century, but a few people still practice it. Often they take advantage of the latest technology: plastic flexible handcuffs, or "flex-cuffs."
It is claimed that no one can slip out of flex-cuffs once the cuffs have been fastened. Since they operate in one direction only and cinch shut, supposedly the only way out is to cut the cuffs with special pliers. But is this really true?
A quick Google search for "flex-cuffs" + "escape artist" yields the Web site of Anthony Martin, who has made a career out of escaping from a variety of places, including the Marinette County Jail in Marinette, Wisconsin. A document allegedly verifying his escape is included on his site (my emphases in bold).
This is to verify that at the Marinette County Jail, ANTHONY was completely searched. He was then restrained in six (6) flex-cuffs which were previously checked to insure no tampering had occurred. Both of his wrists were tied inside his legs with the back of his hands to his ankles. Two additional flex-cuffs connected ANTHONY’S wrists and ankles to his neck.
In this immobilized position he was locked in an isolation cell of the old jail from which he escaped in less than four (4) minutes.
The same Google search als0 turns up a book by John Novak called The Art of Escape #3: Metamorphosis. The book is sold for $18. Here's the description, again with my emphasis in bold:
The Metamorphosis is covered in detail, along with variations and a complete treatise on the most modern form of police restraint - The Flex Cuffs. Also included is a basic television interview that can be used to advantage in promoting your feats of escape. Partial list of the contents: Costume Changes; the Substitution Trunk; Siegfried and Roy; Hatboxes and Elephant Stands; Houdini's 1910 Stock Escape; and An Essay in Speculation.
Another site informs us, "These books [Novak's series] have been very popular among escape artists for over 20 years." So it's not as if this is new information.
It would seem, then, that as "modern" as flex-cuffs may be, they are hardly escape-proof. In fact, a few people have literally made a career out of escaping from them, and information on how to do so has been readily available for two decades.
This doesn't necessarily mean that all materialization mediums are slipping out of their cuffs. It does mean that caution and vigilance are called for.
There's just no escaping that fact.
"There were undoubtedly many magicians, fakers, and charlatans posing as mediums, but it was William James who said that it takes only one "white crow" to prove that all crows aren't black."
Michael Tymn -
This is a quote from a Michael Tymn article that is worth reading for all of those wondering if mediumship has any validity.
"Mediumship: Direct Connection to a level of the Afterlife, Telepathy or Fraud?" by Michael Tymn.
“Interestingly, however, some crows were found to be white with dark spots. They offered genuine phenomena with some fraudulent.”
Love the way Michael Tymn states this about some mediums. Some wanting to please the sitter every time while others I suspect wanting to please every time for the money.
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/articles/other/tymn.htm
Posted by: william | June 19, 2007 at 06:13 PM
A Biography of the Brothers Davenport - Thomas Nichols, 1864, 360 pp
http://www.spiritwritings.com/BiographyBrothersDavenport.pdf
p 166
p169
People From the Other World
Henry S. Olcott
http://survivalebooks.org/#People%20From%20the%20Other%20World
different mediums but I think it is a similar situation....
.26
Posted by: jklng349h7beh | June 19, 2007 at 06:40 PM
Before I looked at the two above comments, I was preparing to add a comment. It is interesting that William referenced one of my articles, but even more interesting that my comment was about a 1920 book titled "Dawn of the Awakened Mind," the author being John S. King, M.D., president of the Canadian Society for psychical research. (note that second comment above is by JKing. Dr. King attended many materialization seances with the Toledo, Ohio medium J. B. Jonson. While Jonson also needed a cabinet in which the spirits could build up the energy to materialize, King observed as many as 20 different friends and relatives materializing at one seance. One of them was his wife, May, who "gradually dissolved into the floor" in front of him on several occasions. He recorded a half-dozen or more sittings with Jonson, with an average 12 materializations at each of them -- all recognized by one of the sitters as a friend or relative. Hard to believe that a medium could impersonate that many people, including their voices, and veridical facts. Moreover, there was much cross-correspondence coming through the direct-voice mediumship of two other mediums, e.g., his wife told him she would materialize at Jonson's house, etc.
I'm not sure about the Davenport brothers, I do know that some of what has been called cheating by the debunkers has been a lack of understanding on their part as to the nature of the phenomena, as Michael has mentioned in an excellent article. There is also some indication that low-level spirits can interfere and make it look like cheating. Randi will be one of them after he transits.
Posted by: Michael Tymn | June 19, 2007 at 10:57 PM
For me at least mediums like George Wright who had a whole host of mediumship abilities never tried to make a dime from those abilities even during times of financial hardships for him and his family but only sought knowledge by connecting with a master on the other side through automatic writing. His life story supports the validity of mediumship.
Also, even though he was a popular and well-known editor he never wrote about his abilities as a medium. It was his son Theon and wife Nella that wrote about his mediumship that brought through the teachings of the Master only to help Nella Wright cope with his death.
Their book has a surprise ending that helps to support the validity of correspondence with those on the other side.
Posted by: william | June 20, 2007 at 12:21 AM
I will need clarification on this part
"and information on how to do so has been readily available for two decades"
where is this available.. if so, why don't we see more tampering of goods that are secured by flex cuffs????
Posted by: Satya | June 20, 2007 at 01:33 AM
>"and information on how to do so has been readily available for two decades"
>where is this available
As I said, it's in a book by John Novak called The Art of Escape #3: Metamorphosis, which has been in print since 1979.
Posted by: Michael Prescott | June 20, 2007 at 11:15 AM
Though I know the name Dave Thompson has been banished around here, I've spoken to sitters who personally tied metal cable cords instead of "flex ties" and have also sat next to Dave while materializations walked around and showed their bodies using illuminated plaques. So either the fraud protocol goes way beyond the type of knots used, or there's more to this story than parlor tricks.
Posted by: Cyrus | June 20, 2007 at 04:12 PM
I have been doing some research on the Davenport brothers and it appears that it depends on the beliefs of the person writing the article as to whether the brothers are described as frauds or successful mediums.
Maybe they were those white crows with black spots that Michael Tymn talks about.
It appears that some Mediums are not always endowed with superior character traits and some appear to be capable of inducing paranormal phenomena and fraud in their séances all in the same week.
In fact the source of their mediumship abilities appears to be a mystery. Some evidence suggests it might be hereditary.
Two mediums that I have done a lot of research on that stand out with these superior character traits are George Wright and Margery Crandon.
Posted by: william | June 20, 2007 at 06:43 PM
>Two mediums that I have done a lot of research on that stand out with these superior character traits are George Wright and Margery Crandon.
I wouldn't put much stress on Mina Crandon, who used the pseudonym Margery. The "thumbprint episode" pretty much destroyed her credibility, in my opinion. (Click on the link and scroll about 2/3 down the page.)
She may have produced some valid phenomena in her earlier years, but in the end she was caught in fraud.
Posted by: Michael Prescott | June 20, 2007 at 08:30 PM
Michael I disagree with you on this one. It appears the fingerprint fraud was caused by her husband not her. The book "a life after death" by Ralph Harlow is a good read as he set in on those séances for three years and has many stories of her feats that I have not read anywhere else. Ralph Harlow appears to be as about as sincere investigator and skeptic of the paranormal as one can find.
Scientists from all over the world including two MIT professors came to test her and she passed some pretty interesting tests.
Houdini could not be trusted as evidenced in your article. It was Houdini’s cage that she sat in and she still performed so Houdini succumbed to fraud in the next séance to discredit her. It would take a pretty naïve person to allow Houdini to design the box she sit in and be a witness to her séances if she was a fake.
She never charged one cent for her séances for over 20 years and these séances would wear thin for a joke or for attention over that period of time.
Also she was a skeptic at first and to show her husband there was nothing to spiritualism as he had heard Lodge speak and he became interested in spiritualism she visited a medium and she was told she had mediumship abilities.
It is the collective evidence that I lean towards for her apparent validity not one incident.
Sorry Michael but have to report you to victor on this one.
Posted by: william | June 21, 2007 at 03:54 AM
What's the evidence for Dr. Crandon being responsible?
After one of the seances she gave in London in 1929 a piece of wax was found with her thumb print on it, when she was supposed to be controlled.
I think the likeliest explanation was that she was using a die to stamp these prints out, though I'll admit this isn't a completely satisfying theory, since no dies were ever found, and that most people at that time thought it impossible to produce a 3D impression via a flat fingerprint, so if this is how it was done, she deserves points for amazing inventiveness, at least!
That's not to say she was entirely fraudulent. Hereward Carrington thought that she had produced genuine phenomena and I respect his opinion enormously.
The direct-voice thing is the most interesting & disturbing feature of the case to me, because I can hardly imagine any more dramatic, challenging display to scientific orthodoxy than that. Now Nandor Fodor reports that this was proven by Thorogood's microphone-in-a-box experiment and Dr. Richardson's
voice-control device. But if this is so, why is it not more eagerly reported?
Wish I could track down all the old SPR and ASPR journals to try clear up this uncertainty.
I know Michael Tymn reads this blog -- what do you think?
Posted by: Darryn | June 21, 2007 at 07:21 AM
Hi, I think Helen Duncan was a legimate physical medium so was Daniel D Homes, Eussapia Pallandino. As far as that book psychic mafia goes it was endorsed by a closed-minded skeptic and yes he said he was fooling people so everyone must be like that too. I don't think they are! What made me really think Helen Duncan is legimate is because when the cops turn on the lights this stuff ectoplasm went back in her body and then died after. As one reseacrher pointed out it is like ectoplasic material.Is it possible that why people calim it looks like cheesecloth because it looks similiar. Another physical medium was Jack Webber in my opinion who knows he could also be a legimate medium.
Posted by: Leo | June 21, 2007 at 12:39 PM
Ralph Harlow claims that Walter her brother who came through from the other side could perform some interesting feats to numerous to report all of them here.
Like moving a scale inside a locked and sealed glass box with two MIT professors watching and with pictures. Also many apports were reported at these séances by Ralph Harlow in his book a life after death.
If she was a fraud she deserves more fame and fortune as a magician than the great Houdini.
Just a thought but a friend of mine has told me that fingerprints are not that reliable as evidence.
Sorry but years of paranormal feats is a lot of evidence and to say she was a fraud over one bogus fingerprint is a bit of a stretch to label her a fraud. Did she lose her abilities over time and succumb to fraud. Maybe?
It appears even the great Houdini had to succumb to fraud to try and discredit her.
I know I am sounding defensive here but sometimes our skeptical minds can overwhelm our rational minds. (i.e. ultra skeptics)
Posted by: william | June 21, 2007 at 03:30 PM
I finished reading the book I posted about above.
A Biography of the Brothers Davenport - Thomas Nichols, 1864, 360 pp
http://www.spiritwritings.com/BiographyBrothersDavenport.pdf
It's quite entertaining and I recommend it as an enjoyable read. The author seems convinced that the Davenports were genuine mediums.
I looked at the about.com article and I'm not convinced that the one case of refusing to continue with the seance because the knot was too tight proves fraud. Being tied for more than a few minutes can be extremely painful. There seem to be many many accounts where sufficient precautions were taken.
The answers.com article says the general consensus is that they were frauds but it doesn't say among whom that consensus was held. It seems out of place for them to make that statement because in the article there is overwhelming evidence pointing to the brothers being genuine. Charges of fraud are vague and unexplained phenomena are described in detail. From the article
http://www.answers.com/topic/davenport-brothers
Posted by: jklng349h7beh | June 22, 2007 at 12:35 PM
I can see no point to focusing on what may or may not have happened long ago, often with an air of drama within elaborate stage settings, when nearly anyone who wishes to can create their own immediate and personal experiences in the privacy of their own home. (I do grant that history can be quite fascinating, but is such fascination at all effective in terms of obtaining a satisfying knowing?)
This quiet validation is not the same as attempting to prove that which is very difficult to prove in a laboratory, but who cares, really, save for the detached observer unwilling to dive in or, at least, get his or her feet wet?
It rarely involves "physical" manifestations, either, but if that is desired, it's not entirely out of the question.
I'd venture to say that the areas of mediumship, channelling, telepathy, clairvoyance, and so on exist where, within the framework of modern beliefs, psychology meets the supernatural; by its nature, this region of consciousness is best experienced, not commented upon from a distance -- it is necessarily highly subjective (as a race we aren't likely to truly understand the nature of 'objective reality' at this moment, anyway).
We always bring our assumptions and beliefs to the party, and that is particularly true when dealing with non-material beings; to a great extent, we create a distorted version of their reality, one aligned with our beliefs, during such explorations.
This is very likely to be quite far removed from what they may actually experience, however, as we are entranced from an early age in a "camouflage" physical reality, and often assume its rules apply everywhere.
Yet _we_ are "non-material" beings, too, temporarily expressed within a physical reality; we have but to access regions of our own self -- our "sub" and "un" conscious, where our own intimate and personal awareness of existence resides.
This is not at all difficult to accomplish, although it may require some persistence in learning to still the conscious mind while retaining full awareness, some experimentation with trance.
Those firmly wedded to a materialist perspective may deride any or all such explorations -- "It's only imagination!" they may say; "Prove it!" they may say.
How sad that they are unwilling to employ their own natural powers of imagination; these powers are one means for opening the doorways to greater places, beyond space and time, beyond physical life.
Regards
Bill I.
Posted by: Bill Ingle | June 24, 2007 at 10:01 AM