« Book review: The Afterlife Interviews, Volume 1 |
My Facebook friend Michael Sudduth has an impressive new website dealing with matters spiritual. Check it out!
January 19, 2013 | Permalink
Whew! What a scholar. His reviews of Carter and Fontana are brilliant.
The Gipper |
January 20, 2013 at 03:46 AM
He has written a well balanced article (in a link) concernin super-psi v survival.
no one |
January 20, 2013 at 09:21 AM
Here's a quote from his review of Carter's book on NDEs, etc.:
Moreover, Carter shows how the supposition of dualistic interactionism actually accounts for a range of phenomena that are inexplicable on the materialist hypothesis, for example, the placebo effect, cognitive behavioral therapy, and psychic abilities.
How funny it would be for some notorious scoftic who has received an organ transplant to have his tastes and behavior (e.g., saying “What’s your sign, baby?”) turned around in this way and try to explain it away in materialist terms. (Or to pretend it hadn’t happened (or wasn’t happening), like A.J. Ayer after his NDE.)
Roger Knights |
January 21, 2013 at 04:38 AM
I wrote a small review to a review of Sudduth following forum:
January 21, 2013 at 05:29 AM
Here is another anti-survivalist treatment of mediumship by Michael Sudduth:
January 21, 2013 at 02:18 PM
I wouldn't characterize Sudduth as an anti-survivalist. I think his aim is to clarify the issue by disposing of what he sees as the weaker arguments. That said, I admit I haven't had time to read his papers yet.
Michael Prescott |
January 22, 2013 at 11:37 AM
I would be glad to have Your opinion on at least one of Sudduth's papers, posted or by Juan,or by me.
I also don't think he is anti-survivalist,after all he converted to hinduism from christianity.Former includes not only soul(and life after death),but also some kind of deity,astral body and reincarnation
January 22, 2013 at 03:26 PM
Suddoth extends his argument from just mediumship to cover virtually all evidences for survival in psychical research in his review on his website of David Lund's book Persons, Death and Souls, in an upcoming JSSE. ( A Critical Response to David Lund’s Argument for Postmortem Survival , at http://michaelsudduth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/JSE-272-SUDDUTH-COMMENTARY-Proof.pdf ).
He is saying that all the usual arguments for survival based on mediumship, apparitions, NDEs and reincarnation memories and birthmarks, used even by philosophers like David Lund, Robert Almeder and Chris Carter, are invalid. And that a dissociation-augmented motivated living agent psi (LAP) hypothesis can explain the data better than survival. In other words, mediums are strongly motivated to console loved ones and do so by impersonating the deceased, going into dissociated psychological states where the impersonations are possible with enhanced psychic functioning. Drop in communicators (like the Icelander Runki investigated by Haraldsson) are supposed to be subconsciously generated fantasy personalities augmented by psychically derived information, all to support the need to prove survival to the sitters. There is nothing specific about how to explain the veridical, transcendental and life changing features of NDEs, and he only makes a few suggestions about how reincarnation memories and birthmarks somehow might be LAP generated by the parents or family of the deceased, or even the children themselves.
According to his involved philosophical logic (warning - dense academicese) all the evidence of mediumship, apparitions, NDEs and reincarnation combined just isn't enough, or at least the reasoning from it by proponents is fatally flawed. The problem is, then what other evidence is there in the world from the last century and a half of psychical research that could be valid or what other possible reasoning from the existing evidence could be valid? There isn't anything. If Sudduth isn't anti-survivalist, he is certainly giving a good impression of it. If he is truly a believer in Hinduism and therefore of survival, then he seems to be advocating a total reliance on faith.
January 25, 2013 at 12:18 PM
Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons By Dr. Ian Stevenson a lecture at SSE. is in my mind one of the strongest cases against the superpsy hypothesis I know of no recorded acts of telekinesis that can materially and permanently disfigure or re-figure,physical appendages ,produce permanent scaring etc.
steve em |
February 09, 2013 at 11:36 AM
Sen tek basina gizli arzuları tatmin amacıyla bir Istanbul eskort şirketi gerekir. Yerde kızlar hâl herhangi bir çeşit jel eksiksiz. Çok partiler veya çalışma toplantıları hakkında konuştuk ulaşmada söz natürmort olduğunda Birçok kişi yerde eskort kızlar mütehassıslık istemek. Bu olaylarda Sahislarinin klas kalkmak kafaları bir takım ele güne karşı bile partiler hakkında konuştuk daha içinde bir escort vede birlikte çıkartıldıktan sonradan bir özendirme veya emniyetli iş fırsatları mevcut yanı sıra dönüş yapar.
escort bayan |
February 15, 2013 at 12:27 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.