« Those darn Gnostics | Main | Why so mysterious? »

Comments

Didn't the rosa manichelli personality say that her husband had died the first time but the second time when she came through again she said he had remarried? This is a pretty interesting case but that doesn't seem to add up? Wondering what people's thoughts are on that
Robbie

Live burial does seem to have been a widespread problem which could quite plausibly have prompted such a communication. About 30 years ago in the UK a Victorian cemetery was dug up to make way for a steel plant and several coffins were found to have scratch marks on their lids.

Off topic - bureaucrats and the afterlife?

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/article2190026.ece

Mickey D your link didn't work.
What was the article about?

Michael,

Note that the refutation from Alessandro Blasetti doesn't really refute the details; it merely casts doubt as to the believability of the professor. I would suggest two possible avenues of investigation (maybe this would make a fun group project for your blog): poor Rosa probably has family in the area, since this wasn't all that long ago, and if a local pathologist assisted in the alleged exhumation, there may be a record.

"Mickey D your link didn't work.
What was the article about?"

I just pasted it into my browser and it worked. Otherwise stick "nhs derby ghost" into a google search.

"Mickey D your link didn't work.
What was the article about?"

Stick "nhs derby ghost" into a google search. Note the snide article in The Guardian.

Hi, Michael

thank you very much for the transcript of the article. You said:

And I have to wonder why Stoppoloni wouldn't have written up the case for The Journal of Psychical Research or another peer-reviewed publication.

Maybe he had written up for the italian magazine Luce e Ombra. There are many articles in this magazine that are much intriguing and unknow, like this, The Case of Peziardi (I will write the case in Portuguese and in French):

O Caso Peziardi

“Citaremos ainda, reproduzindo-o da revista “Luce e Ombra”, de Milão, (julho de 1905), este fato:

Modesto carteiro italiano, de nome Peziardi, mal conhecia a sua língua, e escrevia, entretanto, poesias em idiomas que ignorava por completo. Certa tarde, encheu uma folha de papel com uma série de sinais que ninguém podia interpretar. Essa escrita estranha foi apresentada ao célebre paleógrafo, professor Gorrésio, então diretor da Biblioteca da universidade. Este, profundamente estupefacto, perguntou quem tinha escrito semelhante página, e o puseram, então, a par de toda a história.

Seria impossível descrever o espanto do sábio e mais, ainda, o de seu visitante, quando se verificou que o escrito era a reprodução integral de uma inscrição única, a qual, desde muitos anos, jazia inexplicada no museu de arqueologia, havendo Gorrésio tentado em vão, muitas vezes, interpreta-la, porque o tempo lhe havia apagado muitos sinais; além disso, a pedra se tinha quebrado e era impossível adivinhar o fecho da inscrição.

Agora, com o escrito do carteiro, estava de posse do texto completo e lia que certo chefe bárbaro implorava a proteção da divindade para sua tribo, etc. Desde esse dia, converteu-se Gorrésio ao espiritismo. Numa sessão subseqüente, manifestou-se o chefe bárbaro, declarando exata a tradução do paleógrafo e acrescentando que a sua inscrição fora despedaçada por um raio.

Source: No Invisível, page 237, by Léon Denis.

In French:

Nous citerons encore, d’après Luce e Ombra, de Milan, juillet 1905, le fait que voici :

« Un modeste concierge de l’hôtel des Postes, nommé Peziardi, connaissait à peine un peu d’italien et, néanmoins, écrivait des poésies en des langues ignorées de lui. Un soir, il remplit une grande page de papier ministre d’une série de signes que personne ne pouvait interpréter. Cette étrange écriture fut présentée au professeur Gorresio, célèbre paléographe, alors directeur de la Bibliothèque de l’ ‘Université. Celui-ci, profondément stupéfait, demanda qui avait écrit une page semblable, et on le mit au courant de toute l’histoire. Il serait impossible de décrire l’étonnement du savant et plus encore celui de son visiteur, lorsque celui-ci apprit que cet écrit était la reproduction intégrale d’une inscription runique, qui depuis bien des années reposait inexpliquée au musée d’archéologie, et que Gorresio avait tenté, à plusieurs reprises, d’interpréter, mais vainement, parce que le temps avait effacé beaucoup de signes ; en outre, la pierre étant rompue, il avait été impossible de deviner la fin. Maintenant, mis en possession du texte complet, il lisait qu’un certain chef barbare implorait la protection de la divinité sur sa tribu, etc... De ce jour, Gorresio fut converti au spiritisme. Dans une séance subséquente, le chef barbare se manifesta, déclarant exacte la traduction du paléographe et ajoutant que son inscription avait été brisée par un coup de foudre. »

Disponible em http://spirite.free.fr/ouvrages/invisible20.htm

**off topic**
Yesterday I ordered The Art of Dying by Peter Fenwick from Amazon.com. I'm hoping it has something new in it that I haven't read before. It's supposed to have some death bed visions in it! I love me some death-bed-visions. Can't wait till it gets here.

Didn't the rosa manichelli personality say that her husband had died the first time but the second time when she came through again she said he had remarried?

No. The statement about her husband having died was included in the Internet version of the story, but not the Fate magazine version. In Fate's version, she says nothing about having been married in her first communication.

I would suggest two possible avenues of investigation (maybe this would make a fun group project for your blog): poor Rosa probably has family in the area, since this wasn't all that long ago, and if a local pathologist assisted in the alleged exhumation, there may be a record.

That's a good idea, and if anyone who reads this blog can pursue it, I'd be interested to know what turns up.

Stories always get blown up and manhandled after a bit of time has passed. Also time, like what happened when, gets all dis-com-boob-erated, and embellished, so by the time we get to hear the story there's no telling the truth exactly is. I'm betting my theory also applies to the New Testament and the story of Jesus. I bet he was a simple near death experiencer who came back from the grave and talked about having been to heaven. Add a few years and the next thing you know there's a virgin birth, walking on water, raising the dead, etc.

This just smells like--no reeks of--urban legend.

Sounds like another urban legend to me.

The supernatural is a world filled with them.

Indeed:

http://tinyurl.com/c35ml5

“I bet he was a simple near death experiencer who came back from the grave and talked about having been to heaven. Add a few years and the next thing you know there's a virgin birth, walking on water, raising the dead, etc.”

This is a pretty big jump Art lots of people have had near death experiences and they don’t gain the reputation or following of a Jesus. Of course St Paul helped the cause for Jesus as a religious leader. From my point of view at this time Jesus appeared to be a very advanced soul on a mission.

Now what is more interesting to me is how the human mind works. How we will accept and even filter incoming information to fit our paradigm that promotes or agrees with our cherished beliefs. Example I was watching a special on Hitler and because he survived so many attempts on his life (43) he believed that meant that he was destined to do what he was doing. Maybe he thought God was on his side.

Art please don’t believe that I am accusing you of being a Hitler that is not my point. I am just using an extreme example of how powerful paradigms are and how it is nearly impossible to recognize our existing paradigms. They are hidden from our view and it usually takes a very significant emotional event to even begin to challenge our existing paradigm.


My point is Hitler could have with a rational mind thought if so many of my own people want to kill me maybe I am doing something wrong. The human mind is an interesting phenomenon. By making these statements in no way am I inferring that my mind is immune from such phenomena.

As a side note in a belief watch Newsweek article they are talking about what our bodies are like in heaven. I.e. the astral world.

I just don't think it takes long for stories to become embellished and the sequence of events changed and stuff added to where it's barely possible to recognize what originally happened, regardless of whether it's Rosa Spandoni or Jesus the son of Joeseph and Mary. I sift through everything I read and try and use what makes sense to me.


I'm betting my theory also applies to the New Testament and the story of Jesus. I bet he was a simple near death experiencer who came back from the grave and talked about having been to heaven. Add a few years and the next thing you know there's a virgin birth, walking on water, raising the dead, etc.

I just don't think it takes long for stories to become embellished and the sequence of events changed and stuff added to where it's barely possible to recognize what originally happened

I think this is the truth for most of the more sensational near death experiences as well. I wouldn't trust everything I read on neardeath.com and nderf.com. Near death experiences has become a commercial industry, some of these sites even features Google Ads. I think the only reliable authorithy on this subject is iands.org

Also there is one problem using near death experiences as proof of after life - these people are not truly death. Otherwise it would not be possible to revive them. I however think that it must be possible to prove veridical perception during NDEs - either it happens or doesn't happen. Such a discovery would bring back the golden ages of psychic research.

I wouldn't trust everything I read on neardeath.com and nderf.com. - steen
--------------------------------------------
I am more likely to trust NDE's that describe "holographic" type experiences. Feelings of overwhelming oneness and connectedness, feeling like they are literally everywhere in the Universe at once, 360 degree vision, time and space not existing, having all knowledge, communicating telepathically, things being made out of light, during the life review feeling the emotions and telepathically hearing the thoughts of the people they interacted with, seeing colors they've never seen before and hearing sounds they've never heard, even overwhelming feelings of Love, all fit in within the parameters of what one might expect in a holographic universe. Many life reviews descriptions seem to be very holographic. No one has yet to explain away to me the amazing and mind boggling connection between NDE's and what Michael Talbot wrote about in The Holographic Universe. I've read too many NDE's that say things that I've read in popular physics books for it to be just an accident.
Near Death Experiences: A Holographic Explanation, by Dr. Oswald Harding, http://www.amazon.com/Near-Death-Experience-Holographic-Explanation/dp/9768202092/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1233428022&sr=1-1

Something I don't understand about the supposed frequency of people waking up in coffins, buried alive. How long can you survive in a buried coffin? How much air is there? People buried in an avalanche of snow seem not to last more than an hour, and one would think snow would be much less compact than clods of dirt. So if someone has lain insensible, without sign of life, for days, is it likely that they'd wake up almost the instant the burial was complete? Otherwise, they'd be dead anyway, right? How do you come back to life after you've been buried for, say, a mere four hours? And anudder ting. How come you never hear of the "dead" suddenly coming back to life on embalming tables or funeral pyres? It just don't add up.

Shrewsbury,

It isn't unheard of. See these stories:

http://tinyurl.com/d53ml4

and

http://tinyurl.com/cenrf9

This fellow woke up and asked for a drink while laying in the morgue awaiting autopsy:

http://tinyurl.com/5dsnej

George Rodonia's NDE:
http://www.word-gems.com/death.nde.case.george.html

"Dr. Rodonaia underwent one of the most extended cases of a "clinical near-death experience" ever recorded. Pronounced death immediately after he was hit by a car in 1976, he was left for three days in a morgue. He did not "return to life" until a doctor began to make an incision in his abdomen as part of an autopsy procedure."

George Rodonia's NDE is a bad example of an NDE simply because he wasn't dead. So obviously he can't report anything from 'the other' side.

George Rodonia's NDE is a bad example of an NDE simply because he wasn't dead. So obviously he can't report anything from 'the other' side. - steen
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you'd like to stay attached to your body till it starts to rot, be my guest, but I find it very comforting that the Creator of the Universe allows the soul to exit the body long before the body starts to decompose. If the soul had to stay attached to the body long after the body completely died it would involve more suffering than is necessary. I've read many NDE's where the person said that they "popped" out of the body even before a crash occurred, which I'm sure was a kindness to insure that they didn't have to endure all the subsequent pain and suffering. Once the soul is finished with the body it discards it like a worn out pair of tennis shoes, with little to no emotional attachment and quickly moves on into the Light.

“If the soul had to stay attached to the body long after the body completely died it would involve more suffering than is necessary”

This appears to be so as I read one story of an NDE where the soul watched on the shore as his physical body was drowning. Also many spirits that come through mediums talk of leaving their bodies right before they are killed in some type of accident like falling off a cliff or auto accident.

william, I have read the same thing in many NDE's also. By the way, I just ordered The Art of Dying by Dr. Peter Fenwick from Amazon.com. It cost me ~ $10.00 + $3.99 shipping. I can't wait! It's like waiting for a delicious meal to arrive. I can't wait to devour it! Yum!!!

I have a small collection of "life after death" books that I've collected over the past 9 years, the amount of time I've been reading about and studying about life after death. I only keep the books that I really like, the rest I trade at a used book store in Nashville, TN. Every once in a while I stumble upon a real gem.

It's still unclear whether NDE's occur while the brain is flatlined or immediately before. This has not been proven yet.

I think it's a real possibility that psi exists and that NDE's are a psi phenomena but a phenomena that still depends on a living brain.


It's still unclear whether NDE's occur while the brain is flatlined or immediately before. This has not been proven yet.

Dutch researcher Pim van Lommel argues that the brain flatlined during the NDEs he's studied. The article can be read here.

Michael, Thank you for linking to that article. I have never read this follow-up of the original Lancet article. There is one of his arguments I don't like - a reference(I assume) to the Pam Reynolds case:

It is important to mention that there is a well documented report of a patient with constant registration of the EEG during cerebral surgery for an gigantic cerebral aneurysm at the base of the brain, operated with a body temperature between 10 and 15 degrees, she was put on the heart-lung machine, with VF, with all blood drained from her head, with a flat line EEG, with clicking devices in both ears, with eyes taped shut, and this patient experienced an NDE with an out-of-body experience, and all details she perceived and heard could later be verified.

You have argued yourself that there was no flatline EEG during the verifiable part of Pam Reynolds NDE. So I think this reference is a bit damaging to his overall argument.

You have argued yourself that there was no flatline EEG during the verifiable part of Pam Reynolds NDE. So I think this reference is a bit damaging to his overall argument.

True.

2 quotes from "Art":

"**off topic**
Yesterday I ordered The Art of Dying by Peter Fenwick from Amazon.com. I'm hoping it has something new in it that I haven't read before. It's supposed to have some death bed visions in it! I love me some death-bed-visions. Can't wait till it gets here."

"By the way, I just ordered The Art of Dying by Dr. Peter Fenwick from Amazon.com. It cost me ~ $10.00 + $3.99 shipping. I can't wait! It's like waiting for a delicious meal to arrive. I can't wait to devour it! Yum!!! "

Well, "Art", or I suppose I should say, "Dr. Fenwick", can't you be a little less obvious? Ordinarily that kind of bottom-feeding tactic is merely annoying; but your persistence is obnoxious. Please stop.

Art has been commenting here for a long time. He is not Peter Fenwick.

I think it's fair to advertise for a book relevant for the discussion. Art probably hopes someone will pick up a discussion about Death Bed Visions.

Hey, be nice to Art! He seems like a nice guy.

BTW, Dr. Peter Fenwick just did this very interesting interview on Skeptiko:

http://www.skeptiko.com/index.php?id=75

The comments to this entry are closed.